1 1004 WP 2917-2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1004 WRIT PETITION NO. 2917 OF 2019 MARUTI NAMDEO BAGAL VERSUS MANGAL RAJENDRA BAWKE AND OTHERS … Mr. Majit S. Shaikh – Advocate for Petitioner Mr. A.S. Gandhi – Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 Ms. M.L. Sangit – AGP for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 … CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 17.01.2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. By way of the present petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 20.08.2018 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Shirdi Division, Shirdi in R.T.S. Appeal No.181 of 2017 and order dated 14.12.2018 passed by the Additional Collector, Ahmednagar in R.T.S. Appeal No.810 of 2018. 3. While issuing notice, this Court by interim order dated 06.03.2019 directed that the action in furtherance of the order dated 30.11.2014 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Shirdi, Dist. Ahmednagar, shall remain in abeyance. 2026:BHC-AUG:1866 2 1004 WP 2917-2019.odt 4. Learned Counsel appearing for both sides submit that a First Appeal arising out of the same proceedings is pending before the learned Ad-hoc District Judge, Rahata, Dist. Ahmednagar. 5. It is well settled that mutation entries are only fiscal in nature and do not create any title. The inter se rights of the parties are to be adjudicated by the competent Civil Court. Since the First Appeal between the parties is pending, it would be appropriate to dispose of the present proceedings with an observation that the necessary mutation entries shall be effected subject to the final outcome of the said appeal. 6. In the meanwhile, the parties shall maintain status quo with regard to the mutation entries. 7. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in above terms. 8. Interim order dated 06.03.2019 stands continued till the decision of the First Appeal. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE Pooja Kale/