Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2170 (GAU)

SOUTH BANK MULTIPURPOSE CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

WP(C)/1588/2026 · 2026-03-17

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010055852026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1588/2026 SOUTH BANK MULTIPURPOSE CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED REP. BY ITS SECRETARY NAMELY ZIAUR RAHMAN, AGED 4 YEARS, S/O- LATE MONSER ALI, VILL AND P.O- JHOWDANGA, DIST- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN-783131, VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY TOTHE DEPARTMENT OF FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-01 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF FOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 3:THE COMMISSIONER OF FOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND LEGAL METROLOGY ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-07 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM P.O- HATSINGIMARI PIN-783135 5:THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COMMISSIONER Page No.# 2/3 FOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CONSUMER AFFAIRS SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM P.O- HATSINGIMARI PIN-783135 6:THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SUPPLY (IN CHARGE) FOOD PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION CONSUMER AFFAIRS SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM P.O- HATSINGIMARI PIN-78313 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR R ISLAM, MR. A H MOLLAH,MS. A HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 18.03.2026 Heard Mr. I. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. U. Das, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the State respondents. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties at some length, it transpires that the petitioner needs to incorporate some more details. Mr. Choudhury has, therefore, submitted that the writ petition may be allowed to be withdrawn with the liberty to file afresh. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Choudhury, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, to file afresh. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE Comparing Assistant