M/S MAA BHAGWATI CONSTRUCTIONS v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/1241/2026 · 2026-03-19
Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Shri Sanjay K Agrawal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2170 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2170 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 WPC No. 1241 of 2026
2026:CGHC:13387-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1241 of 2026 M/s Maa Bhagwati Constructions, Through Its Partner Parul Rai, S/o Rajesh Kumar Rai, Age About 42 Years, R/o Flat No. 107, First Floor, Vaishali Pride, Minocha Colony, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. Engineer In Chief, Public Works Department, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Sector 19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Rapur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur Zone, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Superintendent Engineer, Public Works Department, Bilaspur Circle, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
5. Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division No. 1, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents For Petitioner :- Ms. Khushboo Naresh Dua, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Chetan Singh Chauhan, Advocate. For State :- Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Government Advocate. ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Date: 2026.03.20 17:00:38 +0530
2 WPC No. 1241 of 2026 Division Bench Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Justice
Sachin Singh Rajput
Order
On Board
(20.03.2026) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
1. This petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to pay incentive bonus to the petitioner which is payable under Clause 5.3 of the Percentage Rate Tender and Contract for Works (Annexure P/11).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already made representation (Annexure P/12) to respondent No.5 herein/Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, for payment of incentive bonus, but the same has not been considered and decided yet, therefore, respondent No.5 may be directed to decide the petitioner’s representation within the stipulated time.
3. Learned State counsel would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be considered and decided in accordance with law.
4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties, considered their submissions and gone through the records.
3 WPC No. 1241 of 2026
5. Admittedly, petitioner has already made representation (Annexure P/12) before respondent No.5 herein seeking incentive bonus. In that view of the matter, respondent No.5/Executive Engineer, Public Works Department is
directed to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation with regard to incentive bonus in accordance with law within three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Petitioner is at liberty to file additional representation/additional documents in support of earlier representation which is pending before respondent No.5.
6. With the aforesaid observation/direction the instant writ petition stands disposed off. However it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput)
Judge Judge Ankit