VIVEK ALIAS BALU MHATARBA ALIAS MHATARDEO SHEDALE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
APPLN/3229/2026 · 2026-08-20
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2170 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2170 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 3229 OF 2026 IN ABA/101/2026 Vivek Alias Balu Mhatarba Alias Mhatardeo Shedale VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another Mr. V. S. Wakale, Advocate for applicant Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for respondent-State
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 20th AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. Heard learned Counsel for both sides.
2.
Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant would not have gained anything by allowing dismissal of the application for want of prosecution. He, therefore, seeks restoration thereof.
3. Learned APP opposed the application.
4. Prima facie perusal of the application indicates that sufficient reason has been put forth by the applicant for his non appearance before this Court on 01.07.2026. In the interest of justice, application stands allowed. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 101 of 2026 stands restored at the stage of its dismissal. 914-Cri Appln-3229-2026.odt 1 of 2
5. At the request of learned APP, stand over to 16.09.2026.
6. Interim relief, if any, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.) B. S. Joshi 914-Cri Appln-3229-2026.odt 2 of 2