Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2170 (ALL)

SMT. VANDANA SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/18973/2026 · 2026-05-13

Garima Prashad, Saral Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 18973 of 2026 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that the subject matter of the present writ petition is pending consideration before the respondent no.2-District Magistrate, Prayagraj by way of an application for compensation under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna, which was filed on 12.03.2026 and the same has not been decided till date. 2. Per contra, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents contends that the matter can very well be considered by the competent authority and therefore, an appropriate direction be issued to the competent authority to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent No.2-District Magistrate, Prayagraj within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives the representation of the petitioner. May 14, 2026 SS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhiraj Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Smt. Vandana Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad