Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21699 (JHR)

SAMLENDRA KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH C. R. P. F. REPRESENTED THROUGH INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE TRIPURA SECTOR

LPA/60/2025 · 2026-07-21

Rajesh Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:21437-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 60 of 2025 1. Samlendra Kumar aged about 40 years Hawaldar/Ministry force no. 065350466,189, Battalion - C.R.P.F Mahur Assam, S/O-Siya Ram Sah, Quarter no. D.K.4 - 100, Resident of Domgarh, P.S-Sindari, Dist.- Dhanbad, (Jharkhand), Pin code no. 828107... Appellant Versus 1. Union of India through C.R.P.F represented through Inspector General of Police Tripura Sector, Agartalla." 2. Inspector General of Police C.R.P.F Tripura Sector, Keripubal, Agartalla (Assam). 3. Deputy Inspector General of police C.R.P.F, Agartalla range Tripura. 4. Commandant, 189 Battalion C.R.P.F, Mahur (Assam). ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Appellant : Mr. Shambhu Nath Singh, Advocate Mr. Faruque Ansari, Advocate Mrs. Shabana Perween, Advocate Mr. Vishal Kumar Gupta, Advocate Mr. Chatur Prasad Singh, Advocate Mr. Jitendra Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Prashant Pallav, A.S.G.I. Mr. Radha Krishan Gupta, C.G.C. Ms. Shivani Jaluka, A.C. to A.S.G.I. --------- 05/Dated: 21.07.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. After arguing the matter for some time, the learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions from the appellant who is present in the Court makes a solemn statement that the appellant will join for duties in the office of the Commandant, 189 Batallion, C.R.P.F., Shantipara, Balangir (Odisha) within 21 days from today without giving any excuses whatsoever. 3. This statement is accepted. 2026:JHHC:21437-DB 4. Further, on instructions from the appellant who is present in the Court, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw this appeal and make submissions before the disciplinary authority, on the issue of quantum of punishment as directed by the learned Single Judge in the impugned order. He further states that such submissions will be filed in writing before the disciplinary authority within six weeks from today. 5. The timeline set out in the impugned order is now extended by a period of 12 weeks from today. 6. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn by recording the above statements made on behalf of the appellant, in his presence. accordingly. 7. IAs, if any pending in this appeal, will not survive and are disposed of. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 21.07.2026 N.A.F.R. APK/VK Uploaded on 24.07.2026