Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21696 (KAR)

SMT KEMPAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/44961/2019 · 2026-06-10

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27950 WP No. 44961 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.44961 OF 2019 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KEMPAMMA D/O LATE CHANNALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. 2. SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE V T VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. 3. SRI. LAKSHMINAYANA S/O LATE V.T. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE R/AT VADDARAHALLI VILLAGE, KADABGERE POST, DASANPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU -562 130. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJA S.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560001. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27950 WP No. 44961 of 2019 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU -560 009. 3. THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU -560009. 4. SRI. BYLANJANAPPA S/O LATE RAMALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2 SRI. MARUTHI NILAYA, VADDARAHALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK -562 130. 5. SRI. DODDALAPPA S/O LATE RAMALINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT, VADDARAHALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK-562 130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.J. ESWARAPPA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. M. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE FORM NO.10 IN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27950 WP No. 44961 of 2019 RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.44 MEASURING 7 ACRES 30 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT VADDARAHALLI VILLAGE, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3 AS PER ANNEXURE-E. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the prayer made by the petitioners is to direct the respondents to issue Form-10 in respect of the land in question by considering the representation made by respondent No.4, produced at Annexure-E to the Writ Petition. 2. Taking into consideration that the petitioners have no locus standi to seek for such a prayer in this Writ Petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68