OIC Ltd. Vs. Kanta Devi & Ors. CMPs No. 20440, 20441 & 20442/2026 in FAO No. 37/2012 31.08.2026 Present: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate, for the non- applicant/appellant. Mr. Dibender Ghosh, Advocate, for applicant/respondent No. 3. CMP No. 20442/2026 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and delay in re-filing the application for release of amount, after removal of objections, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 20441/2026 The present application under Order 32, Rule 12, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed by applicant/respondent No. 3, Kumari Sakshi for discharging her natural guardian, as she has attained the age of majority. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant and also taking into consideration the fact that the applicant has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from her Matriculation Certificates, appended with the application as Annexure A-1, wherein her date of birth has been mentioned as 25.01.2004, the present application is allowed and natural guardianship of applicant/respondent No. 3, Kumari Sakshi is ordered to be discharged and she is permitted to pursue the case in her own capacity. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 20440/2026 The present application, under Section 151 CPC, has been filed by applicant/respondent No. 3, Kumari Sakshi for release of the award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel vice for the non- applicant/appellant, under instructions received from the original counsel, states that he has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same are allowed and the award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicant/respondent No. 3, Kumari Sakshi, as per her share, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to her bank account, details whereof have been mentioned in the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 31st August, 2026 (raman)