201. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Ritu Sharma State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR 1. was passed: 2. efforts, he has not been able to get instructions from the petitioner. 3. want of prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to the present petition in case any cause still survives. 4. 26.05.2026 sanjeev IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sharma Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Abhinandan Sekhri, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. ----- NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) On the last date of hearing i.e. 20.05.2026 was passed:- “The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 03.04.2008 (Annexure P dated 31.03.2008 of the petitioner was cance order was stayed by this Court vide order dated 08.08.2008 and further made absolute vide order dated 10.05.2010. Learned counsel for the parties seek an adjournment to get instructions. Adjourned to 26.05.2026.” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite his best he has not been able to get instructions from the petitioner. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to petition in case any cause still survives. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-6655-2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.05.2026 .... Petitioner .... Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Abhinandan Sekhri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. i.e. 20.05.2026, the following order “The challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 03.04.2008 (Annexure P-4) whereby the transfer order dated 31.03.2008 of the petitioner was cancelled. The said order was stayed by this Court vide order dated 08.08.2008 and further made absolute vide order dated 10.05.2010. Learned counsel for the parties seek an adjournment to Adjourned to 26.05.2026.” the petitioner submits that despite his best he has not been able to get instructions from the petitioner. In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive petition in case any cause still survives. , if any, shall also stand disposed of. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No , the following order “The challenge in the present petition is to the order 4) whereby the transfer order lled. The said order was stayed by this Court vide order dated 08.08.2008 Learned counsel for the parties seek an adjournment to the petitioner submits that despite his best In this view of the matter, the present petition is dismissed for revive SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.05.27 09:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document