Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2168 (JHR)

ISRAIL ANSARI ALIAS MONU ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11148/2025 · 2026-03-23

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8017 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11148 of 2025 Israil Ansari @ Monu Ansari, aged about 27 years, Son of Ibrahim Ansari, Resident of village Govindpur Hedlakh, P.O. Kanchanpur, P.S. Katkamsandi (Pelawal O.P), District Hazaribag (Jharkhand) … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Afaque Ahmed, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : None --- 04/23.03.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Nobody appears on behalf of the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.05.2025 in connection with S.T. Case No. 323 of 2025 arising out of Katkamsandi P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1358 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 108 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita pending in the court of learned A.D.J.-VI, Hazaribag. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband and had married the victim. He has also submitted that the petitioner had tried to save the victim by breaking the roof of the house. He has further submitted that independent witnesses have not supported the prosecution case and the trial is in progress. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the serious nature of allegation and that the marriage was solemnized on 20.04.2025 and she found dead in her matrimonial house on 08.05.2025, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. The instant bail application is accordingly, rejected. 2026:JHHC:8017 2 7. However, the State is directed to ensure prompt production of witnesses. 8. Learned counsel for the State is directed to communicate this order to the Director, Prosecution as well as Superintendent of Police of the concerned district. 9. As nobody appears on behalf of the State, let a soft copy of this order be communicated to the office of learned advocate general to ensure compliance. 10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 23.03.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-25.03.2026