LAKRA ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR NIZEAL LAKRA ALIAS NIGEL LAKRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cont.(Cvl)/463/2026 · 2026-07-24
Rajesh Shankar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21676 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21676 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:21924 1 | P a g e
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 463 of 2026 ----- Lakra Enterprises, through its proprietor, Nizeal Lakra @ Nigel Lakra, S/o Late Samuel Lakra, R/o Bero, P.O. & P.S.-Bero, District-Ranchi .......... Petitioner -Versus-
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Sri Anjani Kumar Mishra, Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur Division, Ranchi
3. Sri Manjunath Bhajantri, Deputy Commissioner-cum- District Magistrate, Ranchi
4. Sri Upwan Bara, District Supply Officer, Kotwali, Ranchi
.......... Opp. Parties -----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ayush Kumar Verma, Advocate For Opp. Parties : Mr. Suresh Kumar, S.C. (L&C)-II -----
Order No.04
Date: 24.07.2026
1. The present contempt case has been filed for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 16.01.2025 passed in W.P. (C) No. 6426 of 2018.
2. Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned S.C. (L&C)-II, appearing on behalf of the opposite parties, refers to the show cause affidavit dated 21.07.2026 filed on behalf of the opposite party No. 3 and submits that the PDS license of the petitioner has been restored, subject to outcome of the pending L.P.A. (Filing) No. 2930 of 2026.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner accepts the fact that the PDS license of the petitioner has been restored.
4. Considering the aforesaid fact, there is no need to further proceed in the present matter. The contempt
2026:JHHC:21924 2 | P a g e
proceeding as against the opposite parties is hereby dropped.
5. The present contempt case stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
24.07.2026 Vikas/ Uploaded on 24.07.2026