Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21675 (MAD)

Vigneshkumar v. The Branch Manager

WP(MD)/5737/2026 · 2026-03-03

Hemant Chandangoudar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD)No.5737 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.(MD)No.5737 of 2026 Vigneshkumar ... Petitioner vs. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Channel Road Branch (258), Melur, Madurai District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to activate the petitioner’s saving bank account bearing No.32390189220 except to the lien amount Rs.10,000/- by considering the petitioner’s representation, dated 11.12.2025, within a stipulated time that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.T.Palanisamy For Respondent :Mr.N.S.Karthikeyan ***** 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5737 of 2026 O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to defreeze the petitioner’s Savings Bank Account No. 32390189220. 2. Mr. T. Palanisamy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner’s bank account was frozen on the ground that a sum of Rs. 10,000/- had been fraudulently transferred to his account and that the said transaction is under investigation. 3. Mr. N.S. Karthikeyan, learned counsel for the respondent, submitted that the petitioner’s bank account was frozen in view of the pending investigation. 4. I have considered the submissions made on either side. 5. It is not in dispute that the bank account has been frozen alleging that a sum of Rs.10,000/- has been fraudulently transferred to the petitioner’s 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5737 of 2026 bank account. In such circumstances, it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to operate the bank account, subject to the respondent marking a lien for a sum of Rs.10,000/-. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to the limited extent that the respondent shall mark a lien for a sum of Rs.10,000/- in the petitioner’s bank account and permit the petitioner to operate the account for the remaining balance. No costs. Index :Yes / No 03.03.2026 Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No cmr 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD)No.5737 of 2026 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. cmr W.P.(MD)No.5737 of 2026 03.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis