Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21673 (PNJ)

SAHIL KUMAR ALIAS PRINCE v. STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH

CRM-M/23555/2026 · 2026-05-27

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111 CRM-23712-2026 in/and CRM-M-23555-2026 Date of decision: 27.05.2026 SAHIL KUMAR ALIAS PRINCE ......Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - Mr. Vivek Kathuria, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Simsi Dhir Malhotra, Addl. Public Prosecutor for respondent-U.T. Chandigarh. (Through Video Conferencing). ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) CRM-23712-2026 The present application has been filed for seeking preponement of the date of hearing of the main case which is otherwise fixed for 15.07.2026. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the main case is taken up on Board today itself. CRM-M-23555-2026 The instant petition has been filed for seeking grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 0004 dated 27.02.2026 registered under VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-23712-2026 in/and -2- CRM-M-23555-2026 Sections 21 of the NDPS Act, 1985 (Section 29 of the NDPS Act added later on) at Police Station Sector 11, Chandigarh alongwith the consequential proceedings arising therefrom. After arguing the matter at some length, Counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) MAY 27, 2026 JUDGE Vishal Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document