SAHIL KUMAR ALIAS PRINCE v. STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH
CRM-M/23555/2026 · 2026-05-27
Vinod S Bhardwaj
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21673 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21673 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 111
CRM-23712-2026 in/and
CRM-M-23555-2026
Date of decision: 27.05.2026
SAHIL KUMAR ALIAS PRINCE
......Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH
.......Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
***** Present: - Mr. Vivek Kathuria, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Ms. Simsi Dhir Malhotra, Addl. Public Prosecutor
for respondent-U.T. Chandigarh.
(Through Video Conferencing).
***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)
CRM-23712-2026
The present application has been filed for seeking preponement of the date of hearing of the main case which is otherwise fixed for
15.07.2026.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the main case is taken up on Board today itself. CRM-M-23555-2026
The instant petition has been filed for seeking grant of regular bail in case bearing FIR No. 0004 dated 27.02.2026 registered under VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-23712-2026 in/and
-2- CRM-M-23555-2026
Sections 21 of the NDPS Act, 1985 (Section 29 of the NDPS Act added later on) at Police Station Sector 11, Chandigarh alongwith the consequential proceedings arising therefrom.
After arguing the matter at some length, Counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) MAY 27, 2026
JUDGE Vishal Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable
: Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2026.05.28 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document