- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27718 WP NO.14177 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.14177 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMIDEVAMMA W/O LATE RAJANNA, D/O SHRI. ERANARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O NOUKAL PALYA VILLAGE, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, SOMANAHALLI POST, BENGALURU - 560 116. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. YOGANANDA P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU - 560 001. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, KANDAYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY. SRI. B.J. ESWARAPPA, AGA) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27718 WP NO.14177 OF 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN L.N.D/RA(S)01/2026 INITIATED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 BEFORE THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AGAINST THE PETITIONER UNDER RULE 108K OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE RULES, 1966 IN TERMS OF NOTICE VIDE ANNEXURE-D, AS ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND ARBITRARY; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. B.J. Eswarappa, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this petition, the petitioner is challenging the Notice issued by the respondent No.2-Assistant Commissioner in the proceedings bearing No.L.N.D/R.A(S)01/2026 under Rule 108K of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966. 3. Heard Sri. Yogananda P., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. B.J. Eswarappa, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents. 4. Having taken note of the submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties and on perusal of the averments made in the petition, I am of the considered opinion - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27718 WP NO.14177 OF 2026 that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent No.2 in terms of the Notice produced at Annexure-D and produce the relevant documents to substantiate her case. Therefore, I find no material to interfere with the writ petition. However, in order protect the interest of the petitioner, till the conclusion of the proceedings by the respondent No.2 in the impugned proceedings, the respondents are directed not to interfere with the possession of the subject land by the petitioner. With this observation, writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20