Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21671 (AP)

BUDHA MANJULA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/4542/2022 · 2026-02-26

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010306752022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4542/2022 Between: 1.BUDHA MANJULA, W/O MURALI TATA RAO, AGED 48 YEARS R/O 16-10-13/2, SUNKARAMETTA JUNCTICR OPP. KONATHALA COLLEGE, BESIDE SAI BRUNDAVAN HOTEL ANAKAPAIL. TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, AT AMARAVATHI FOR CBI/ACB 2.STATE BANK OF INDIA, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, BALAJI NAGAR, SIRIPURAN-, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS ASST. GENERAL MANDGE-, RACPC- 1. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI 2.K B RAMANNA DORA The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: No representation for the Petitioner. Ms. P.Akhila Naidu, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been filed. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to challenge the chargesheet, if so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 27.02.2026 VTS