M/S AVITEK COMPUTERS, M/S NITIN KUMAR VARSHNEY v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER
WTAX/2528/2026 · 2026-05-13
Saumitra Dayal Singh, Swarupama Chaturvedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2167 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2167 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT TAX No. - 2528 of 2026 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
HON'BLE SWARUPAMA CHATURVEDI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Challenge has been raised to the ex parte Adjudication Order dated 29.08.2024 passed under Section 73 of the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017.
3. Preliminary objection has been raised that the petitioner has alternative remedy of appeal.
4. On the issue of limitation, reliance has been placed on M/S Shree Shakti Infra Vs. State of U.P. & Anr., 2026:AHC:277-DB, following another order passed in M/S Bambino Agro Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., 2025:AHC:229995-DB.
5. In view of the above, it appears, the petitioner has statutory remedy of appeal available to it. Leaving that course open, interference claimed is declined.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. May 14, 2026 Abhilash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Divya Prakash Tripathi, Tanmay Sadh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Swarupama Chaturvedi,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) M/S Avitek Computers, M/S Nitin Kumar Varshney .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ABHILASH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad