- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26895 WP No. 15251 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 15251 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. JAMARUNISSA DAUGHTER OF DODDA ABDUAL SABI WIFE OF KAREEM SABI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT HAREJANAHALLI VEMGAL HOBLI KOLAR TALUK -563 102 2. SMT. SALEEMUNNISA DAUGHTER OF DODDA ABDUAL SABI WIFE OF MASTHAN SAB AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT HAREJANAHALLI VEMGAL HOBLI KOLAR TALUK -563 102 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUNIL T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SYED AMMERJAN SON OF LATE SYED SALAR SABI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT HAREHANAHALLI VEMGAL HOBLI KOLAR TALUK -563 102 2. SYED ANWAR SON OF LATE SYED SALAR SABI AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26895 WP No. 15251 of 2024 RESIDING AT HAREHANAHALLI VEMGAL HOBLI KOLAR TALUK -563 102 3. SYED USMAN SABI SON OF LATE SYED SALAR SABI AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT HAREHANAHALLI VEMGAL HOBLI KOLAR TALUK- 563 102 4. MEHABOOB SON OF LATE SYED SALAR SABI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT HAREHANAHALLI VEMGAL HOBLI KOLAR TALUK -563 102 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02/03/2024 ORDERED AND DIRECTED THE PLAINTIFFS TO FURNISH THE STAMP DUTY ON A INSUFFICIENT STAMP DUTY IN OS NO. 325/2014 PENDING ON THE FILE OF 1ST ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE, JMFC, KOLAR, AT ANNEXURE-E AND TO GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF OR RELIEFS AS SITUATION DEMANDS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26895 WP No. 15251 of 2024 ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is of the year 2024. The office objections were not complied with right from 2024. When the matter came up before this Court for the first time on 02.06.2026, on that day there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Considering the same the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for ‘dismissal’. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, it appears that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE PKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4