M/S RAJHANS TRANSPORT, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR NAMELY VIDYAPATI SINGH v. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
WPC/3146/2025 · 2026-07-22
Rajesh Shankar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21664 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21664 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:21671-DB 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3146 of 2025
M/s. Rajhans Transport, having its office at Gharounda Complex, near Jagdeo Path More, Bailey Road, Khazpura, PO & PS-Bailey Road, District-Patna, Bihar through its Proprietor namely, Vidyapati Singh, S/o Ganpat Singh, Flat No. 802, Gharounda Complex, near Jagdeo Path More, Bailey Road, Khazpura, Patna ... ... Petitioner Versus
1. Food Corporation of India, through its Chairman and Managing Director, having its head office at Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi
2. The General Manager, Food Corporation of India having its Regional Office at New Collectorate Building, Block-A, 4th Floor, Kutchery Road, Ranchi
3. The Assistant General Manager (Contract), Food Corporation of India having its Regional Office at New Collectorate Building, Block- A, 4th Floor, Kutchery Road, Ranchi
4. The Divisional Manager, Food Corporation of India, having its Divisional Office at Deo Mansion, Jagrity Nagar, Karnibagh, PO & PS-Deoghar, District-Deoghar
5. The Manager (Contract), Food Corporation of India, having its Divisional Office at Deo Mansion, Jagrity Nagar, Karnibagh, PO & PS-Deoghar, District-Deoghar
6. M/s. Imran Ansari, through its Proprietor Imran Ansari, S/o Furkan Ansari, R/o Khalasi Mohalla, Madhupur, PO & PS-Madhupur, District- Deoghar
... … Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioner
: Mr. Ankit Vishal, Advocate For the Respondent-FCI
: Mr. Shubham Sinha, AC to
Mr. Nipun Bakshi, Advocate -----
Order No. 04
Dated: 22.07.2026
1. Mr. Ankit Vishal, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
2. Accordingly, leave is granted and this petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
4. Pending I.As. will not survive and are disposed of.
(M. S. Sonak, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) July 22, 2026 Manish/Ritesh