Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21661 (PNJ)

TRIPURARI CHOPRA v. CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

CWP/17385/2026 · 2026-05-27

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17385-2026 Date of Decision : 27.05.2026 TRIPUARI CHOPRA .....Petitioner VERSUS CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present : Mr. Yaseen Sethi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Gurmeet Kaur Gill, Sr. Panel Counsel, for respondent no.1-UOI. Ms. Diksha Sharma, Advocate, for respondents no.2 and 3. KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) 1. At the outset itself, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered by this Court in CWP-35478-2025 vide order dated 29.11.2025, therefore, the present writ petition can be disposed of in the same terms. 2. On an advance notice, Ms. Gurmeet Kaur Gill, Sr. Panel Counsel, has caused appearance on behalf of respondent no.1-UOI, and Ms. Diksha Sharma, Advocate, has caused appearance on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3, through a validly executed power of attorney in her favour. The same is taken on record. DHARAM VIR 2026.05.29 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-17385-2026 -2- 3. Both learned counsel for the respondents, fairly concede the submission as made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Consequently, the present writ petition is, disposed of, in terms of the verdict dated 29.11.2025, drawn upon CWP-35478-2025. (KULDEEP TIWARI) May 27, 2026 JUDGE dharamvir Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No DHARAM VIR 2026.05.29 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document