Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21659 (CHH)

SHAMBHU KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4464/2026 · 2026-06-17

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24581 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4464 of 2026 Shambhu Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Laxman Prasad Yadav Aged About 45 Years Working As Sub Engineer (Rural Engineering Service), Sub Division Ambagarh-Chowki, District Mohla Manpur Ambagarh-Chowki (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Development Commissioner Office Of Development Commissioner, Vikas Bhawan, North Block Sector- 19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Chief Executive Officer Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Vikas Bhawan Civil Lines, Raipur, (C.G.) 4. Engineer In Chief Office Of Development Commissioner, Vikas Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.) 5. Collector District Mohla Manpur Ambagarh-Chowki, (C.G.) 6. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Mohla Manpur Ambagarh-Chowki, District Mohla Manpur Ambagarh Chowki, (C.G.) 7. Executive Engineer Rural Engineering Service, Division Mohla Manpur Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.) District- Mohla Manpur Ambagarh Chowki, (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Ms. Deeksha Gouraha, P.L. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.06.18 17:39:57 +0530 2 Hon'ble Justice Shri Bibhu Datta Guru Order on Board 18/06/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition for issuance of direction to respondent- transferring authority to relieve him on the grievance that though the transfer order has been issued by the State Government on 11.03.2026 (Annexure-P/1), till date he has not been relieved. 2. The issue regarding implementation of transfer order has been considered by this Court in the case of Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others, 2015(4) C.G.L.J.182, wherein relying upon several judgment of the Supreme Court, it has been held by this Court that once the employee has been transferred, it is required to be executed, unless it is modified, varied or cancelled by the State Government itself. 3. Therefore, in these circumstances, this petition is disposed off with the direction that the petitioner shall be relieved forthwith by the controlling authority in compliance of order dated 11.03.2026, unless the State has not modified, varied or cancelled the impugned transfer order. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Jyoti