1 APHC010277582013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1389/2013 Between: 1.GRANDHI PADMAVATHI,, W/O. S. KANAKA RAO, HINDU AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, ANGANWADI WORKER, R/O. 23-21-15, LALITHA NAGAR, FIRST LANE, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2.Y. RAJESWARI,, W/O. G. KAMAL KUMAR, HINDU AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, ANGANWADI WORKER, R/O. D.NO.3-132, RAGHAVAPURAM, KORUKONDA MANDALAM, EABST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3.J. RAMA DEVI,, W/O. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, ANGANWADI WORKER, R/O. ITIKAYALA PALLI POST, GOKAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4.G. VENKAYAMMA,, W/O. M. PRAKASH RAO, HINDU AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, ANGANWADI WORKER, R/O. KOTHAPALLI POST, GOKAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5.P.N. BHUSHANAMBA,, W/O. APPA RAO, HINDU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, ANGANWADI WORKER, R/O. D.NO.46-18-14, DHANAVAIPETA, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.SMT NIRMALA, W/o. Not known to the petitionar, The Project Director, District Women & Child Development Agency, Kakinada, East Godavari District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punirk the respondent under the section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Court, who is willfully disobeying the orders of the Hon'ble High Court made in WPMP.No.25781 of 2013 in W.P.No.21038 of 2013 dated 17.07.2013 passed by his Lordship Justice Sri. Nooty Rama Mohana Rao under the contempt of Courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.A PADMA Counsel for the Contemnor: 1.GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.1389 of 2013 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.21038 of 2013 was dismissed by this Court by an order dated 02.08.2013. In view of the said order, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. 2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:01.04.2026 KGM 3 168 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO:1389 of 2013 Date: 01.04.2026 KGM