ASHOK LAXMAN HATOTE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
BA/1440/2026 · 2026-08-19
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2165 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2165 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 957ba1440.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 957 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1440 OF 2026 WITH BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1448 OF 2026 ASHOK LAXMAN HATOTE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Andhale Sandip Ramnath (In BA/1440/2026) Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Shrikant G. Kawade (In BA/1448/2026) APP for Respondent No. 1/State : Mr. V.K. Kotecha Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Ms. Karishma Sarin (appointed Through Legal Aid) ...
CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
DATE : 19.08.2026 PER COURT :
1. The learned Advocates for the applicants submit that during the pendency of the applications, the charge-sheet has already filed. Though the charge-sheet is already placed on record, the learned Advocates for the applicants, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the applications and to file fresh applications before the trial Court, post filing of the charge-sheet.
2. The liberty as prayed is granted. In case fresh applications are preferred before the learned trial Court, the learned trial Court will consider the same on its own merits.
3. Both the applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.
(HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) mahajansb/