IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 15186 of 2026. Decided on : 2 nd September , 2026 Dina Nath & Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus HRTC & Another ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocate, Proxy Counsel. For the respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned counsel appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioners’ grievance is that their representation dated 15th July, 2025, (Annexure P-3) seeking applicability of Baldev Chand vs. Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation & Anr.2 has not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners would be content in case the respondents/competent 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 CWP No. 3278 of 2021, titled Baldev Chand vs. Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation & Anr., decided on 08.07.2021. 2 authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 5. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners dated 15.07.2025 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge 2nd September, 2026. (jai)