KHURSHID BANO D/O SADIQUE ALI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 5 ORS
CONPW/100/2024 · 2026-01-08
Shri M S Karnik, Shri S M Modak
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21644 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21644 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
40. CONPW 100 of 2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1809 OF 2017 Khurshid Bano D/o Sadique Ali ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and 5 Ors. ...Respondents ***** Mr. A. A. Maniyar i/by M. G. Ansari Advocate for the Petitioner Shri Himanshu Takke AGP for the Respondent-State ***** CORAM :
M. S. KARNIK AND S. M. MODAK, JJ.
DATE :
8th JANUARY 2026 P. C. :-
1. The learned AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 submits that there is no deliberate breach of the order dated 23.11.2021. It is submitted that during the course of inquiry, on several occasions the Seema 1/2 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date: 2026.01.09 14:41:54 +0530
40. CONPW 100 of 2024.doc hearings were conducted and some inquiry report also had to be called. Because of these reasons, necessary orders could not be passed within time stipulated by this Court.
2. The learned AGP now submits, on instructions, that within a period of 15 days, the order dated 23.11.2021 passed by this Court shall be complied with.
3. Recording this assurance of the learned AGP, we are extending time to comply the order dated 23.11.2021 by a period of 15 days from today. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is disposed of.
4. List the matter on 03rd February 2026, under the caption ‘for compliance’.
(S. M. MODAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Seema 2/2