- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28519 WP No. 16710 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 16710 OF 2022 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: SRI M RAVI SON OF LATE MUNAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.41, SOUTH END 'D' CROSS 6TH MAIN ROAD JAYANAGAR 9TH BLOCK BANGALORE - 560 069 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ALLAH BAKASH M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE - 560 001 2. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE - 560 001 3. SRI CHOUDHARY INSPECTOR OF MICO LAYOUT POLICE STATION MICO LAYOUT BANGALORE - 560 076 4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) OFFICE OF ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM KODICHIKANAHALLI SUB-DIVISION Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28519 WP No. 16710 of 2022 BANGALORE - 560 076 5. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED (BESCOM) K.R. CIRCLE BANGALORE - 560 009 6. SRI. RAKESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS NO.175, 1ST FLOOR, 3RD CROSS BILEKAHALLI LAYOUT BANNERGHATTA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 076 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.V. DEVARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5 SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R2 R3 - SERVED SRI. C. PATTABIRAMAN, ADVOCATE FOR R6) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1-2 TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE R-3 ON THE BASIS OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE 4.8.2022 AND 10.8.2022 ANNEXURE-A AND A1 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER 1. On 05.06.2026, this Court passed the following order: "Order sheet indicate that there is conistent absence of the learned counsel for the petitioner. It appears, petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28519 WP No. 16710 of 2022 However, in the interest of justice, matter is adjourned to 12.06.2026 on payment of cost of Rs..500/- payable to the High Court Legal Services Committee.. It is made clear that if there is no representation on the next date of hearing, appropriate orders including dismissal would be passed." 2. Even today, neither there is representation nor the cost has been paid. Petitioner seems to have lost interest in prosecuting the matter. 3. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE PSJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11