IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.15033 of 2026 Decided on: 2nd September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Raman Kumar …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Adarsh K. Vashista, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner seeks applicability of Kuldeep Singh Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others2. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 CWP No.9484 of 2024, decided on 10.03.2026 2 preferred any representation for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 02, 2026 Judge Mukesh