APHC010299042019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 13805/2019 Between: 1. KARPURAPU SUBBARAO, S/O VEERARAGHAVULU, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS OCC BUSINESS R/O PENUMAKA, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS ,FILE SECRETARY FOR HOME VELAGAPUDI - 522503 2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DIST - 522503 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DIST. - 522503 4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DIST. - 522501 5. PAREM SAVITRI, W/O BUTTCIAH AGED ABOUT 54, PENUMAKA VILLAGE, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST - 522501 6. PAREM CHANDRASHEKAR, S/O BUTTCIAH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE, CRDA, PENUMAKA POST, TADEPALLIMANDAL, GUNTUR DIST - 522501 7. PALAGANI KOTESHWARAMMA, W/O RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, YERRABALEM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DIST 522503 8. PELAGANI CHAILAYAMMA, W/O VENKATESHWAR RAO AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, YERRABALEM VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DIST - 522503 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring action of respondents 2 to 4 insisting the petitioner' to hand over the shops which are .n the possession of the petit. one r is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art 21 of constitut on of India and directing the Respondent No. 1 to 8 not to interfere in my possession, the shops, as per the alleged will dated 23.10.2000 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct respondent to remove to unlock the petitioner property i.e. shops which were given to the tenants which seriously affects livelihood of tenants and petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P GOPAL DAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.13805 of 2019 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption 8For Dismissal9. Even on earlier occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondent Nos.1 to 4, is in attendance. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 7th January, 2026 cbn 4 34 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.13805 of 2019 7th January, 2026 cbn