2026:HHC:36698-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1217 of 2026 In CWP No.1811 of 2026 Decided on: 31.08.2026. ________________________________________________________ Raj Kumar & Another ...Petitioners Versus Dr. Abhishek Jain & Others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioners: Mr. Prashant Manhans, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Heard. 2. Notice. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. On telephonic instructions received, Learned State Counsel states that representations submitted by the petitioners, which were directed to be decided in terms of the order/judgment dated 26.02.2026 in CWP No.1811 of 2026, titled Kuldip Kumar and Others v. State of Himachal Pradesh & 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:36698-DB - 2 - Others, shall be decided in accordance with law within three weeks from today. 4. The statement made by Learned State Counsel, being innocuous, is not opposed by Learned Counsel for the petitioners also. 5. In aforesaid terms, the Contempt Petition is disposed of and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, accordingly. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge August 31, 2026 [Shivender]