APHC010294732024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15076/2024 Between: 1. LANKA SRIRAMULU, S/O.VEERABHADRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.8-28-18/D, BALAJIRAOPET, TENALI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , A.P. POLICE HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, COLLECTOR OFFICE ROAD, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, III TOWN POLICE STATION, TENALI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 5. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, TENALI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 6. VISHNUMOLAKALA VENKATESWARLU, S/O. KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 9-27, AMMANABROLU VILLAGE, NAGULUPPALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. 7. PEETHA NAGA MALLESWARI, W/O. LATE RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. CHINTALAMALAPALLI, MORRISPET, TENALI TOWN, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Official Respondents more particularly the Official Respondents No.4 and 5 in regularly calling the Petitioner to come to III Town Police Station, Tenali Town, Guntur District to settle the civil disputes with the Unofficial Respondents No.6, 7 which are pending for adjudication without any justifiable cause and threatening with dire consequences to file false cases against him due to political influence of the Unofficial Respondents No.6, 7 2 is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, against the principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and direct the Official Respondents No.11 and 5 not to call the Petitioner to the III Town Police Station, Tenali Town, Guntur District and not to put troubles to the Petitioner and not to file any false cases against the Petitioner and his family members and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue any writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Official Respondents more particularly the Official Respondents 4 and 5 in regularly calling the Petitioner to come to III Town Police Station, Tenali Town, Guntur District to settle the civil disputes with the unofficial Respondents 6 and 7 which are pending for adjudication without any justifiable cause and threatening with dire consequences to file false cases against him due to political influence of the Unofficial Respondents 6 and 7 is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, against the principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and direct the Official Respondents No.11 and 5 not to call the Petitioner to the III Town Police Station, Tenali Town, Guntur District and not to put troubles to the Petitioner and not to file any false cases against the Petitioner and his family members and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner who appeared in virtual mode and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that there are property disputes between the Petitioner and unofficial respondents with regard to the subject property and civil suit is pending before the concerned Civil Court, which is pending for adjudication. Further, respondents 6 and 7 filed a petition before the Public Grievance Redressal System and enquiry purpose, petitioner was called to the Police Station and no crime is registered and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of by passing appropriate orders. 4 In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 15076 of 2024 07.01.2026 Mjl /*