APHC010304072015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 36147/2015 Between: 1. THE KENDRIYA BHANDAR R/O.KENDRIYA BHANDAR, R/O.KENDRIYA BHANDAR, KOTI, HYDERABAD REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, A.V.RAMANA MURTHY, S/O APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WOMEN CHILDREN DISABLED & SENIOR CITIZEN DEPT., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DIRECTOR, WOMEN DEVELOPMENT & CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT PURCHASE COMMITTEE, VIZIANAGARAM DSIT., VIZIANAGARAM. 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, VIZIANAGARAM DIST., VIZIANAGARAM. 5. THE COMMISSIONER, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased toto issue an appropriate writ,order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing G.O.Ms.No.34 dt.24.09.2015 so far as the work order / Contract period covered under theproceedings No.319/2014/A1 dt.08.04.2015 and subsequent proceedings No.319A\1/2015 dt.02.09.2015 issued by the 3rd respondent in favour of the petitioner to supply Rd gram dhal and Chenna dhal as illegal, arbitrary and against principles of natural justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP 4884 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in WP.No.36147 of 2015, dt.04-11-2015 and pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 46491 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents Nos.3 & 4 to place indent/order of Red Gram Dhal and Chenna Dhal with the petitioner as per proceedings No.319/2014/A1 dt.08.04.2015 and subsequent proceedings No.319/A1/2015 dt.02.09.2015 for the remaining period of work order pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the internet of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R N HEMENDRANATH REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP) 2. GP FOR WOMEN DEV,CHILD WELFARE(TG) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 36147/2015 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. No representation for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the auction conducted is for a period of one year and the said period was ended on 31.03.2016. As such, no cause survives for further adjudication and the writ petition become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 13.02.2026 BSP/TPS 4 55 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 36147/2015 Dated:13.02.2026 BSP/TPS