IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1091 of 2026 Decided on: 2nd September, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vinod Kumar and another …..Petitioners Versus Sh. Rakesh Kanwar and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that the judgment rendered in Vipin Sharma and others Versus State of H.P. and others2, sought to be enforced by the petitioners, is based on the decision rendered in Ghanshyam Dass and others Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others3. That operation of the decision rendered in Ghanshyam Dass and others3 has been stayed vide order dated 17.08.2026 passed in LPA No.205 of 2025 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 CWP No.914 of 2026, decided on 09.01.2026 3 CWP No.2056 of 2023, decided alongwith connected matters on 21.03.2024 2 (State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. Vs. Chunni Lal) and connected matters. In view of above, the present contempt proceedings are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are discharged. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioners to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for the redressal of their surviving grievances, if any, at an appropriate stage, in case need so arises in future. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 02, 2026 Judge Mukesh