AKSHAY KUMAR DAS @ AKSHAY DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5087/2026 · 2026-07-23
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21623 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21623 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:21846
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 5087 of 2026
Akshay Kumar Das @ Akshay Das, Son of Gopal Das
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, APP
---
03/23.07.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 136 of 2025 corresponding to Cyber Crime Case No. 157 of 2025, registered under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Cybercrime – Special Court, Deoghar.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 29.09.2025 having one criminal antecedent of similar nature. He submits that it is alleged that one Mobile and 3 SIM cards have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and one victim has been identified, though as per the case-diary, there are 11 crime links.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that charge has been framed on 07.05.2026, but no witness has been examined so far.
5.
Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail.
6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner and the fact that no witness has been examined by the State so far, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees
2026:JHHC:21846
2
twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Cybercrime – Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 136 of 2025 corresponding to Cyber Crime Case No. 157 of 2025, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court.
7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:23.07.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:24.07.2026