RAKESH KUMAR ALIAS RAKESH YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6003/2025 · 2026-02-02
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2162 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2162 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:2608
--1-- A.B.A. No. 6003 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 6003 of 2025
---- Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Yadav, aged about 20 years, S/o Lakhan Yadav, R/o village – Lahanga, PO – Latheya, PS – Chhattarpur, District – Palamu, Jharkhand
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Advocate
---- 05/02.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No.69 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 303(2), 117(2) and 109 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned CJM, Palamau.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and false allegation is made of committing robbery. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.11 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that even the petitioner and others have threatened to
2026:JHHC:2608
--2-- A.B.A. No. 6003 of 2025
the extent that they have still related with extremists organization and if the matter reported to the police the informant will have to face dire consequences.
5. Looking into the contents of the FIR it transpires that the allegation against the petitioner and others of committing robbery of cash of Rs.45,450/- and mobile phone and physical assault and even they have threatened that they are having the relationship with extremists too and the informant will be eliminated if he will inform the police.
6. In the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court the same will be decided in accordance with law without prejudice to this order.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 02.02.2026 Sangam/