Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21618 (BOM)

TATA MOTORS FINANCE SOLUTIONS LTD v. LAKSHMI BARTER PVT LTD

CARBP/235/2023 · 2026-01-13

Shri Arif S Doctor

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/2 501-CARBP-235-2023.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.235 OF 2023 Tata Motors Finance Solutions Ltd ...Petitioner Versus Lakshmi Barter Pvt Ltd ...Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.6901 OF 2025 IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.235 OF 2023 _______ Mr. Prathmesh Mandlik a/w Priyesha Patel i/b Nitesh Bhutekar, for the Petitioner. Mr. Kush Shah i/b Vikrant D. Shetty, for the Respondent. _______ CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 13 th JANUARY, 2026 P.C. 1. The matter was mentioned in the morning session and placed on the production board. 2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that pursuant to the filing of the captioned Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the parties have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 30 th September 2025, by which their disputes and differences have been resolved. On this basis, learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw the captioned Petition. 3. The captioned Commercial Arbitration Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The Interim Application is also disposed of. Vaibhav 2/2 501-CARBP-235-2023.DOC 4. Refund of Court fees, if any, as per rules. [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Vaibhav