Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21617 (CHH)

SHAKUNTALA PARMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4487/2026 · 2026-06-15

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:23982 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4487 of 2026 Shakuntala Parmar W/o Radheshyam Parmar Aged About 62 Years R/o H. No. 873, Ward No. 63, Bhatagaon, Awadhpuri, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. The Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. The Secretary, Public Health And Engineering Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 4. The Secretary, Department Of Finance, Accounts And Treasury, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 5. The Executive Engineer, Public Health And Engineering Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Ms. Akanksha Verma, P.L. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2026.06.17 12:52:15 +0530 2 / 2 Order on Board 16/05/2026 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking for issuance of an appropriate direction to the Respondent authorities for considering the claim of the Petitioner for grant of leave encashment in terms of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Work- Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. 2. According to the petitioner, she has made her claim in the light of the recent decision passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.3870/2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.9.2022, wherein similar claim of the petitioner therein has been allowed. The said decision also stands affirmed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.119/2023, decided on 20.6.2023. 3. Given the said facts, the present writ petition is disposed of at this juncture, directing the respondent Authorities to immediately process the claims of all similarly placed person herein in the light of the aforesaid decision passed by this Court on the same subject-matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Jyoti