FRANCIS JULIUS CREADO v. THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA SERVED ON GOVERNMENT PLEADER
WP/1219/2024 · 2026-01-08
Shri M S Karnik, Shri S M Modak
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21614 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21614 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
4-wp 1219-24.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1219 OF 2024 Francis Julius Creado … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent __________________________ None for the Petitioner. Smt. Jyoti Chavan, Addl GP for the Respondent-State. __________________________
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND
S. M. MODAK, JJ.
DATED : 8 th JANUARY, 2026.
P.C. :
1. None appeared for the Petitioner. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Petition. Hence, dismissed for non- prosecution.
2. In any case, it is pointed out by the learned AGP that, appropriate remedy for the Petitioner is provided under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
3. It is open for the Petitioner to invoke the provisions of Section 64 of the said Act.
4. We have not made any observation on the merits of the contentions. Amk 1/2
4-wp 1219-24.doc
5. All contentions of the parties are kept open.
(S. M. MODAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Amk 2/2