2026:HHC:37157 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1767 of 2026 In CWP No.521 of 2024 Decided on: 01.09.2026. ________________________________________________________ Priyanka ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondents & Another Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioners: Ms. Anu Minhas and Mr. Mukul Sharma, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Gautam Sood, Deputy Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Heard. 2. Notice. Mr. Gautam Sood, Learned Deputy Advocate General accepts and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. Petitioner, Priyanka has come up before this Court seeking execution and implementation of judgment dated 12.01.2024, passed by this Court in CWP No.521 of 2024 titled Poonam Thakur & Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., with the plea that 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:37157 - 2 - directions contained in paragraph 14 to grant consequential benefits notionally with further directions that respondents shall give eligible monetary benefits admissible to the petitioner in accordance with law have not been implemented. It is submitted that in terms of judgment referred to above, though the benefit of deemed regularization stands accorded to the petitioner, but the actual monetary benefits in terms of paragraph 14 have not been released to the petitioner. It is further averred that once the once this Court had passed the directions to release the admissible consequential benefits, then the instructions issued by the government, limiting the release of arrears, is per se not in accordance with law, and the same amounts to circumventing the orders passed by this Court. 4. With the consent of Learned Counsel for the parties, this Court disposes of the instant Petition, with direction to Respondents/Competent Authority to comply with the directions contained in paragraph 14 of the judgment dated 12.01.2024, [Annexure P-1] within a period of six weeks from today. 5. Needless to say, that in case benefits in terms of the judgment are not released to the 2026:HHC:37157 - 3 - petitioner, within six weeks from today, the petitioner shall have liberty to seek revival of the instant petition. In aforesaid terms, the instant Petition and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, accordingly. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 01, 2026 [Shivender]