Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.9839 of 2026
Biswamaya Kar
….
Petitioner Mr. D.N. Mohapatra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.R. Pradhan, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India & Others ….
Opp. Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI Mr. I.A. Acharya, Advocate for NALCO
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Order No
ORDER 07.04.2026
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.
3. Mr. I.A. Acharya,
learned counsel entered appearance on behalf of NALCO by filing Vakalatnama in Court. The same be kept in record.
4. Mr. Acharya, learned counsel appearing for NALCO contended that in view of the notification issued by the Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances and Pension, Govt. of India on 05.12.2008, the issue with regard to employees working under NALCO, lies to the Central Administrative Tribunal and not to this Court. p. 2p. 2
5. On being confronted with the notification, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to move the appropriate authority/Court.
6. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands
disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)
Judge Basudev