Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 216 (ORI)

BISWAMAYA KAR v. UNION OF INDIA

WP(C)/9839/2026 · 2026-04-07

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.9839 of 2026 Biswamaya Kar …. Petitioner Mr. D.N. Mohapatra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.R. Pradhan, Advocate -versus- Union of India & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, DSGI Mr. I.A. Acharya, Advocate for NALCO CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 07.04.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 3. Mr. I.A. Acharya, learned counsel entered appearance on behalf of NALCO by filing Vakalatnama in Court. The same be kept in record. 4. Mr. Acharya, learned counsel appearing for NALCO contended that in view of the notification issued by the Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances and Pension, Govt. of India on 05.12.2008, the issue with regard to employees working under NALCO, lies to the Central Administrative Tribunal and not to this Court. p. 2 p. 2 5. On being confronted with the notification, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to move the appropriate authority/Court. 6. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Basudev