Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21598 (HP)

KULWANT SINGH v. NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER

COPC/1235/2026 · 2026-09-02

Ranjan Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:37350 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.1235 of 2026 In CWP No.19867 of 2025 Decided on: 02.09.2026. ________________________________________________________ Kulwant Singh ...Petitioner Versus Nipun Jindal & Another ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting?. For the petitioner: Ms. Bheeshamlata, Proxy Counsel, Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Ajay Singh, Proxy Counsel Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate. Ranjan Sharma, Judge [Oral] Heard. 2. Notice. Mr. Ajay Singh, Learned Proxy Counsel, under instructions of original counsel Mr. Rahul Gathania, accepts and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. Petitioner has come up before this Court, invoking the contempt jurisdiction of this Court against non-compliance of the judgment dated 17.12.2025 [Annexure P-1] passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No.19867 of 2025, titled 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:37350 - 2 - Kulwant Singh v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Anr., wherein respondents were directed to decide the representation filed by the petitioner [Annexure P-5 in the said writ petition] in the light of Vikram Singh’s case, as referred to in the said judgment after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and by passing a speaking order thereon. It is further submitted that neither personal hearing has been afforded nor a speaking order has been passed or conveyed to the petitioner. 4. With the consent of Learned Counsel for the parties, the instant petition is closed with the direction to the respondents/competent authority to decide the representation [Annexure P-5] in the light of the directions contained in the judgment dated 17.12.2025 [Annexure P-1] within a period of three weeks from today [if not already decided]. In aforesaid terms, the Contempt Petition and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of, accordingly. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge September 02, 2026 [Shivender]