DR P INDEEVAR REDDY v. SHRI PATTANSHETTI RAVI SUBASH
CC/1450/2025 · 2026-02-04
Subba Reddy Satti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21593 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21593 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010296622025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1450/2025 Between:
1. DR P INDEEVAR REDDY, S/O. LATE P. CHINNAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. FLAT NO. 1003, VIJAYA BLOCK, MANJEERA MONARCH APARTMENT MANGALAGIRI - 522 502
...PETITIONER AND
1. SHRI PATTANSHETTI RAVI SUBASH, Chief Executive Officer, Dr. NTR Vaidya Seva Trust, (Formerly called as Dr. YSR Aarogyasri Health Care Trust) D.No. 241, MGM Capital Building Near NRI Junction, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondent and punish him for utter violation, gross negligence and wilful disobedience of the Final Order dated 20.02.2025 passed by this Honble Court in W.P. No. 20070 of 2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the physical personal appearance on 21/11/2025 and permit virtual attendance in accordance with the Orders in C.C No. 1450 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D S SIVADARSHAN p. 2 Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. S PRANATHI The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
The above contempt case was filed complaining of violation of the order dated 20.02.2025 passed in W.P.No.20070 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on both sides. 3. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition challenging the proceedings dated 30.08.2024, issued by respondent No.3, terminating the petitioner from service as Joint Executive Officer. The writ petition was allowed on 20.02.2025. The operative portion of said order reads as follows:
“Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed. The proceedings No.Dr.NTR VST/HR/364/2024 dated 30.08.2024 (Ex.P1), issued by respondent No.3, is hereby set aside. Respondents 2 and 3 shall continue the services of the petitioner in respondent No.2-Trust.”
4. The contempt case was filed on 18.06.2025. 5. Pending the contempt case, the respondent has issued the proceedings No. Dr. NTR VST/ADMIN/HR/LEGAL/503/2026, dated 29.01.2026, reinstating the petitioner into contractual employment with immediate effect, however, with some delay. 6.
Given the developments, the Contempt Case is closed. However, this order will not preclude the petitioner from claiming any benefits, if any, in accordance with the law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 05.02.2026 TVN p. 3 134 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CONTEMPT CASE No.1450 OF 2025
Date: 05.02.2026 TVN