Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21584 (AP)

Smt. Machha Indira Aasha Latha Peter v. The State of Aiidhra Pradesh

WP/14747/2025 · 2026-02-03

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010294662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 14747/2025 Between: 1. SMT. MACHHA INDIRA AASHA LATHA PETER, D/O JOHN PETER, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RAMANAYYA PETA GRAMAPANCHAYATH RAMANAYYA PETA, KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL KAKINADA TOWN AND DISTRICT. 2. SRI. MACHHA LAZARAS VIJAY PRASANTH, S/O SAMMUL VINOD, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC - PRIVATE EMPLOYEE RAMANAYYA PETA GRAMAPANCHAYATH RAMANAYYA PETA KAKINADA RURAL MANDAL KAKINADA TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AIIDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT A P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, KRISHNA NAGAR, RAMANAYAPETA, KAKINADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 533005. 3. THE GRAM PANCHAYATH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY GRADE-1 RAMANAYYAPET, KAKINADA RURAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 533005. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of 2 Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondents, more specially, the action of the Respondent Panchayat Secretary in threatening to demolish the extended slab raised over the Plot Nos. 196 and 197 in Survey No. 176/1, Layout Plan No. 132/89, situated at Ramanayyapeta (village), Kakinada Rural (Mandal), Kakinada District of Andhra Pradesh without considering the explanations submitted by the Petitioners on 23-02-2024, 27- 03-2025 and 25-04-2025 and even without awaiting the orders to be passed by the Regional Vigilance and Enforcement Officer, Rajahmundry as being arbitrary/, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India besides being opposed to principles of natural justice and consequently regularize the extended floor area of the Petitioners property and issue IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3'"^ Respondent Panchayat Secretary to consider the explanations submitted by the Petitioners on 23-02-2024, 27-03- 2025 and 25-04-2025 and further direct the Respondents not to take any coercive steps in the matter, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV The Court made the following order: In pursuance of letter dated 02.02.2026 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 3 Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 04.02.2026 SNI 4 262 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.14747 OF 2025 Dated: 04.02.2026 SNI