Rompicherla Yesupadam, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/1738/2026 · 2026-05-04
Subhendu Samanta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2158 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2158 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010025812026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 1738/2026 Between:
1. ROMPICHERLA YESUPADAM,, S/O. LATE ROMPICHERLA JORGE, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,OCC CULTIVATION,
R/O.
NULAKANIVARIGUDEM VILLAGE, RAVIKAMPADU PANCHAYAT, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI ANDHRA PRADESH-522238 . 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534001. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -534001. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADEKELAPUDI POLICE STATION, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534452. 5. ROMPICHERLA YOHAN MOHAN, S/O. LATE ROMPICHERLA JORGE, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,OCC CULTIVATION, R/O.
NULAKANIVARIGUDEM VILLAGE, RAVIKAMPADU PANCHAYAT, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534449
2
6. ROMPICHERLA JACOB, S/O. LATE ROMPICHERLA JORGE, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,OCC CULTIVATION R/O. NULAKANIVARIGUDEM VILLAGE, RAVIKAMPADU PANCHAYAT, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,, ANDHRA PRADESH -- 534449
7. ROMPICHERLA MOSHA RAJU, S/O. LATE ROMPICHERLA JORGE, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,OCC CULTIVATION,
R/O.
NULAKANIVARIGUDEM VILLAGE, RAVIKAMPADU PANCHAYAT, KAMAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534449
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No. 4 in not considering the representation dt 24-12-2025 given by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of articles 14, 16 and 21 and 300A of constitution of India and also direct the respondent no.1 to 4 to give police protection to the petitioner and his family members by considering the representation dt 24-12-2025 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent no.1 to 4 to give police protection to the petitioner and his family members by considering the representation dt: 24-12-2025, pending disposal of Writ Petition, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAYALCHERUVU ABISHEK REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 1738/2026
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition has filed against in action of police authority for not taking proper care on representation of the petitioner dated 24.12.2025. Through written instructions from the Home Department, it has been stated that Station House officer concerned has not received any representation of petitioner on 24.12.2025. Taking note of the said aspect, the petitioner is further directed to approach concerned police station to lodge his complaint. On receiving such complaint, police authorities shall take proper steps according to law. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of. There is no order as to costs. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA
Dated:05.05.2026. SSA