Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21578 (KAR)

SRI V C NAGARAJAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/3692/2019 · 2026-06-10

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27932 CRL.P No. 3692 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3692 OF 2019 BETWEEN: 1. SRI. V.C. NAGARAJAPPA (A1) S/O CHIKKADAREPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 2. SMT. GANGARATHNA (A5) D/O ADINARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS 3. SMT. VIMALA (A6) D/O ADINARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS 4. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA (A8) W/O RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 5. SMT. MANJULA (A9) D/O RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS 6. SRI. NANJUNDAPPA (A15) S/O LATE RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 7. SRI. MANJUNATH (A16) S/O LATE RAJAPPA Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27932 CRL.P No. 3692 of 2019 AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS 8. SMT. RADHA (A17) D/O LATE RAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT VATADA HOSAHALLI VILLAGE NAGARAGERE HOBLI, GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK, CHIKKABALAPURA DISTRICT - 561 208. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVASHANKAR N.R, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M.R. NANJUNDA GOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY GOWRIBIDANUR TOWN POLICE REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SMT. T. ALUVELAMMA W/O V.C. NAGARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT G.K.L.P.S, SULTANPET, NANDI CLUSTER, CHIKKABALAPURA TALUK, AND DISTRICT - 562 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOUMYA R, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. M.A. VENUGOPAL, ADVOCATE FOR R2) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27932 CRL.P No. 3692 of 2019 THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.17/2019 (OF GOWRIBIDANUR TOWN POLICE) IN PCR.NO.18/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE (Jr.Dn) AND JMFC, GOWRIBIDANUR FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 406, 419, 420, 469, 470 R/W 34 OF IPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a Memo stating that since chargesheet has been filed, petitioner intends to withdraw petition. 2. Taking Memo on record, Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. In view of dismissal of petition, pending I.A. does not survive for consideration. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15