Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21578 (AP)

G HARINATH REDDY v. STATE OF AP

WP/13285/2018 · 2026-02-12

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010293552018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13285/2018 Between: 1. G HARINATH REDDY, G. HARINATHA REDDY, S/O. JAYARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE R/O. NAKKANAPALLI VILLAGE, SANTHIPURAM SANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT CHITTOOR DIST ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY GUNTUR 2. THE JOINT DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR AND SPECIAL DEPUTY CALLECTOR, (LAND ACQUISITION), HANDRI NEEVA SUJAH SRAVANTHI (HNSS) PROJECT UNIT-1. MADMPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, HNSS UNIT-I, MADANAPALLI 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, HANDRI NEEVA SUJALA SRAVANTHI PROJECT (HNSS), IRRIGATION MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased toto issue a Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 3rd respondent passing Award No.24/Compubory/2017-18 dated 01.05.2017, so far as in respect of land in Survey No. 23/2A. situiled at Gunjarlapalle Village, Santhipuram Mandal, Chittoor District, as illegal, arbitrary violation of Section 26 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Award No.24/Compulsory/2017-18 dated 01.05.2017 passed by the 3 rd respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to STAY all further proceedings in Roc.S.D.T/72/2016 dated 15.03.2018, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PRAKASH C Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through online and submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.02.2026 KAS 4 103 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13285/2018 Dated: 13.02.2026 KAS