Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21577 (CHH)

CHERURAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2596/2026 · 2026-06-15

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23942 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2596 of 2026 1 - Cheruram Son Of Korgaram, Aged About 54 Years Resident Of Barjore, Post Kansabel, Tahsil Kansabel, District Jashpur (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of Forest And Climate Change, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Secretary Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Sector -243 Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Executive Director Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sakhari Sangh Maryadit Bhawan Sector -24,naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Collector Jashpur, District -Jashpur (C.G.). 5 - District Forest Officer Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas) Sahkari Sangh Maryadit Jashpur Chhattisgarh. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 6 - Forest Range Officer Chhattisgarh State Laghu Vanopaj (Vyapar And Vikas ) Sakhari Sangh Maryadit Kansabel District -Jashpur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Syed Afaque Hussain Rizvi, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. A.G. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 16/06/2026 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “(i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set- aside the impugned order dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent no. 3 in the interest of justice. (ii) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to pay claim compensation amount as per clause 6 (राजमोहनी दे वी तेंदेपत्ता सामोजिजक साराक्षा योजनी) of the said notification with interest at the earliest, in the interest of justice. (iii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted, in the interest of justice.” 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh duly constituted petition. 3. No objection has been raised from other sides. 4. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat