Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21576 (MAD)

Annadurai v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/8125/2026 · 2026-03-26

S Srimathy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.8125 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.03.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY W.P(MD)No.8125 of 2026 Annadurai ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Trichy District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Trichy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Lalgudi, Trichy District. 4. The Tahsildar, Manachanallur, Trichy District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to rectify the error crept in UDR Natham FMB Sketch and include the existing pathway in FMB Sketch in respect of S.No.445/8, 10 and 11 at Thiruppathur Village, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy District by considering the petitioner's representations dated 03.12.2021, 08.07.2024 and 31.01.2026. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8125 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vinayak For Respondents : Mr.D.Gandhiraj Special Government Pleader ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to rectify the error crept in UDR Natham FMB Sketch by including the existing pathway in FMB Sketch in respect of S.No.445/8, 10 and 11 at Thiruppathur Village, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy District by considering the petitioner's representations dated 03.12.2021, 08.07.2024 and 31.01.2026. 2. The petitioner initially submitted a representation dated 03.12.2021 and thereafter sent reminders on 08.07.2024 and 31.01.2026. Since the same have not been considered, the present writ petition has been filed. 3. The petitioner claims that a pathway existing in the original FMB has been omitted in the UDR records and seeks rectification of the same. However, the petitioner had submitted the representations to the District Collector and not to the competent authority, the second respondent. Therefore, the petitioner is 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8125 of 2026 directed to submit a fresh representation to the second respondent within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such representation, the second respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four months therefrom. 4. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 26.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes jbr To: 1. The District Collector, Trichy District. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Trichy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Lalgudi, Trichy District. 4. The Tahsildar, Manachanallur, Trichy District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.8125 of 2026 S.SRIMATHY , J. jbr ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.8125 of 2026 DATED : 26.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis