NARESH KUMAR AND COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, KOLKATA
RVWO/7/2026 · 2026-05-08
Ajay Kumar Gupta, Rajasekhar Mantha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21574 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21574 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
OD-1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION(REVIEW) ORIGINAL SIDE
RVWO/7/2026 WITH CEXA/49/2009 IA NO:GA/1/2026 NARESH KUMAR & CO. VS COMMISSIONER, SERVICE TAX
BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA Date : 8TH MAY, 2026.
Appearance: Dr. (Mr.) J.K. Mittal, Adv.; Mr. P. Sinha, Adv.; Mr. N. Agarwal, Adv.; Ms. A. Thatoi, Adv., for appellant/petitioner. Mr. U.S. Bhattacharyya, Adv.; Mr. K.K. Maiti, Adv.; Ms. B. Bhattacharyya, Adv., for respondents.
1. The Court: Review of this Court’s Judgment dated February 4, 2026 is sought, inter alia, by referring to paragraph 73 thereof.
2. Mr. Mittal, learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner, submits that sub- section (4A) of section 73 of the Central Excise Act was introduced only in 2011 and omitted by the Finance Act in the year 2015 and hence the show cause notice was issued under the said sub-section (4A).
3. This Court, however, notes that the observations made in this Court’s
Judgment were based on the facts and in harmony with the findings of the Court as a whole.
2
4. Even an incorrect judgment cannot be rectified in an application for review under order 47 rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
5. Hence, RVWO/7/2026 stands rejected. There shall be no order as to costs.
(RAJASEKHAR MANTHA,J)
(AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, J.) tk