PARDEEP CHHIKARA & ORS. v. STATE THROUGH SHO & ANR.
CRL.M.C./2367/2025 · 2026-10-06
Madhu Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21569 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21569 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010191312025 + CRL.M.C. 2367/2025 PARDEEP CHHIKARA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pritesh, Adv. Petitioners-in-person versus STATE THROUGH SHO & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Gupta, Adv. for R-2. SI Prashant Kumar Respondent no.2-in-person SI Prashant, PS North Rohini CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R % 06.10.2026
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. By the way of the present petition the petitioner is seeking quashing of, FIR No. 166/2022, registered at Police Station North Rohini, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 387/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’), and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the present FIR came to be registered in relation to a property dispute concerning two plots bearing Nos. C-5/56 and C-5/57, Sector-6, Rohini, Delhi, wherein allegations were made that the Petitioner(s) had threatened the complainant in connection with the said property. Learned counsel for the Petitioner(s) submits that the parties have amicably resolved all their disputes and differences and have entered This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 10:53:31
into a settlement. It is further submitted that, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, Respondent No. 2 has no objection to the quashing of the present FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom. 4. The petitioner and respondents no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer. 5. On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO, has categorically stated that he has entered into compromise, vide Settlement Agreements dated 27.02.2025, out of his own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, he has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. 6. In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them.
It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 7. Accordingly, FIR No. 166/2022, registered at Police Station North Rohini, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 387/120B/34 of the IPC, 1860, along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, is hereby quashed. 8. The present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. 9. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J OCTOBER 6, 2026/prg/KA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 10:53:31