Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2156 (ALL)

RAJESH v. RAJENDRA AND 23 OTHERS

A227/6240/2026 · 2026-05-04

Vikas Budhwar

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6240 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard. 2. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the respondents. 3. The solitary relief claimed in the present writ petition for a direction to the learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)-5th Mathura to decide the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC (6-C application) for temporary injunction in Original Suit No. 1455/2024 (Rajesh versus Rajendra and others), which has been pending since 20.09.2024. 4. Learned counsel prayed that the said application may be decided, expeditiously. 5. Since the above-mentioned case is pending, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 6. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)-5th Mathura to decide the application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC (6-C application) for temporary injunction in Original Suit No. 1455/2024 (Rajesh versus Rajendra and others), which has been pending since 20.09.2024, in accordance with law, within a period of eight months provided there is no other legal impediment. May 5, 2026 Rajesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amrit Shanker Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Rajesh .....Petitioner(s) Rajendra And 23 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad