Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21554 (AP)

Karri Krishna Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/13229/2019 · 2026-02-05

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010288892019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 13229/2019 Between: 1. KARRI KRISHNA REDDY,, S/O.BRAHMA REDDY, HINDU, MALE, AGED- 40 YRS D.NO.27-8-23/2, HARIVILLU HOMES, FLAT NO.113, SRIRAMPURAM, BHIMAVARAM. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT., ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHIMAVARAM II-TOWN POLICE STATION, BHIMAVARM. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT., ELURU. 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, H NO 2, SANTHINAGAR CROSS ROAD, SANTHI NAGAR, ELURU. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASAPURAM. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, II-TOWN POLICE STATION, BHIMAVARAM. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. MANTENA PRAVEEN, S/O.PANDURANGA RAJU, R/O.D.NO.7- 151/2, VENKATA RAJU NAGAR, NEAR AXIS BANK, CHINAINIRAM. BHIMAVARAM. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 8. MANTENA PRADEEP, S/O.PANDURANGA RAJU, R/O.D.NO.7- 151/2, VENKATA RAJU NAGAR, NEAR AXIS BANK, CHINAMIRAM. BHIMAVARAM. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. MANTENA RAJANI, S/O.PANDURANGA RAJU, HINDU, MALE, R/O.D.NO.7-151/2, VENKATA RAJU NAGAR, NEAR AXIS BANK, CHINAMIRAM. BHIMAVARAM. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.13229 OF 2019 ORDER: No one appeared for the writ petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the writ petitioner. Notice taken to the writ petitioner was delivered as per the Registry endorsement. The writ petition was filed alleging that police did not register case, though writ petitioner presented a report. 2. Sri R.Mallikharjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that basing on the private complaint filed by the writ petitioner, referred to police U/s.156(3) Cr.P.C., police registered a case in Cr.No.193/2019 of Bhimavaram II Town Police Station, and investigated into the case. Therefore, the writ petition becomes infructuous. 3. Earlier, on behalf of the petitioner, on 23.01.2026 also submitted that the writ petition becomes infructuous. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 06.02.2026 PSK 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 66 WRIT PETITION No:13229 OF 2019 Date: 06.02.2026 W PSK